EIS/OEIS
What is a Range Complex?
|
Ranges and operational areas (OPAREAs) are locations
where Navy personnel train to accomplish their mission of
national defense. The Navy has geographically grouped its
ranges and OPAREAs to form range complexes, which are
organized and managed to optimize training opportunities in a
safe and controlled environment. The ranges and facilities
of the Jacksonville Range Complex are unique and provide
training opportunities essential for the safety and readiness of
military personnel and the success of the military mission. The
protection of natural and cultural resources is also an integral
component of this training. Navy training activities incorporate
protective measures as standard operating procedures to
promote environmental conservation.
The Jacksonville (JAX) Range Complex
The Jacksonville Range Complex represents an essential three-dimensional
space that
provides a realistic and safe training area for Navy personnel. For nearly 65 years,
the area
has supported Navy training activities, and is now host to a wide range
of training every year to ensure our military members are ready for combat. |
Download High Resolution Map
|
The Jacksonville Range Complex is the principal training area for air, surface,
and submarine units located in Charleston, SC; Kings Bay, GA; and Jacksonville, FL. In
addition to serving as the site for essential Navy training, the Jacksonville Range
Complex is host to activities for research, development, testing, and evaluation of
emerging maritime and combat technologies.
The geographic scope of this EIS/OEIS is referred to as the Jacksonville Range Complex Study Area
(See Figure). The Study Area includes the area from the mean high tide line east (seaward) to the 3-
nautical-mile (nm) boundary of the states of North Carolina (southern portion), South Carolina, Georgia,
and Florida (northern portion). This 3-nm state boundary also serves as the western boundary of the
Jacksonville and Charleston OPAREAs, which are the main part of the Study Area. The Jacksonville
Study Area also includes two land ranges located south of Jacksonville, FL (Rodman Range and the
Jacksonville Range Complex EIS/OEIS Study Area Boundaries
Lake George Range).
The chief area analyzed in
the Study Area is referred to
as the Jacksonville Range
Complex, including its defined
airspace, sea space, and
undersea space. This area
includes a large expanse of
the Atlantic Ocean offshore
from North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, and
Florida eastward to 77° west
longitude.
The Jacksonville Range Complex is a three-dimensional
training area that includes sea space, land ranges and Special
Use Airspace (SUA). The Range Complex also includes
facilities and instrumentation areas that support the training
conducted there.
Sea Space. Often referred to as an OPAREA, sea space
includes areas used on or below the water’s surface. In
the Jacksonville Range Complex there are two OPAREAs:
Jacksonville and Charleston.
Land Ranges. Land ranges include one or more targets used
for a variety of training exercises, such as strike warfare or
marksmanship. This EIS /OEIS evaluates activities at two
land ranges (Rodman Range and Lake George Range). The
nearby Pinecastle Impact Range is not included in the EIS/
OEIS Study Area because an environmental impact statement
was recently completed for the land range and it is currently
being updated (Department of the Navy, 2003).
Special Use Airspace (SUA). Special use airspace is airspace
designated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for
the confinement of certain activities, such as military flight
operations. The FAA also may impose limitations on aircraft
operations that are not part of the designated activities.
Supporting Infrastructure. The land, sea and airspace training
areas are supported by training facilities and instrumentation
facilities.
Background
The Jacksonville Range Complex is a combination of land, sea and airspace where Navy training is conducted.
The Navy is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/
OEIS) to comprehensively evaluate effects of current and future Navy activities within the Jacksonville Range
Complex on the environmental, natural, cultural and socioeconomic resources. This comprehensive evaluation is
part of a larger Navy program, the Tactical Training Theater Assessment and Planning (TAP) Program. Under the
TAP Program, the Navy will for the first time manage its training areas within broad geographic locations known
as range complexes. The Jacksonville Range Complex is one of several range complexes on the east coast.
Why is this needed?
Realistic training is the single greatest asset the military has in preparing and protecting Navy personnel. “Train
As We Fight” is not just a phrase - it is a statement of the absolute
necessity to realistically train Navy personnel for the conditions in
which they may find themselves while protecting our nation.
International events, changes in technology, base closures, and
population growth are increasing the challenges the Navy faces in
training its personnel to be prepared to defend our nation. To face
these challenges and continue to provide combat capable forces
that are ready to deploy worldwide, the Navy is comprehensively
evaluating and planning activities at the range complex level. The
purpose for the proposed action is to:
| Achieve and maintain Fleet readiness using the Jacksonville
Range Complex to support and conduct current, emerging, and future training operations and Research,
Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) operations; |
| Expand warfare missions supported by the Jacksonville Range Complex; and |
| Upgrade and modernize existing range capabilities to enhance and sustain Navy training and RDT&E. |
The need for the proposed action is to provide range capabilities for the training and equipping of combat-capable
naval forces ready to deploy worldwide. In this regard, the Jacksonville Range Complex furthers the Navy’s
execution of its Congressionally mandated roles and responsibilities under Title 10 U.S.C. § 5062.
What is proposed?
The Navy proposes to:
Maintain training and RDT&E operations at current levels if the No Action Alternative is selected.
If either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 is selected, then:
Increase or modify training and RDT&E operations
from current levels as necessary in support of the Fleet
Readiness Training Plan (FRTP).
Accommodate mission requirements associated with
force structure changes, including those resulting from
the introduction of new platforms (aircraft and weapons
systems).
Implement enhanced range complex capabilities.
What will be evaluated?
The Navy understands and recognizes training activities may have potential effects on the environment, as well as to the
community and the stakeholders that rely on these resources. The Navy will analyze several alternatives to determine
the effects of potential actions on natural, cultural and socioeconomic resources. Additionally, public input received during
the scoping phase and Draft EIS public comment period will be carefully considered in the environmental analysis. Three
alternatives have been identified and analyzed:
No Action Alternative:
The No Action Alternative analyzes a variety of training and testing activities that currently occur
within the Jacksonville Range Complex. Under the No Action Alternative, training and testing operations would continue at
current levels. No new or additional training and testing operations or infrastructure improvements would be implemented.
Current operations include surge level operations consistent with the Fleet Readiness Training Plan.
Alternative 1:
No Action Alternative plus: increase operational training,
expand warfare missions, accommodate force structure changes (including
training resulting from the introduction of new platforms), and implement
enhancements, to meet the components of the proposed action. This
alternative is composed of all operations currently conducted under the No
Action Alternative, with modifications to current training or introduction of
new training. These would include:
| a)
|
Using more commercial aircraft to serve as oppositional forces rather
than using Navy aircraft for air-to-air missile exercise, surface-to-air
gunnery exercises, air intercept control exercises, and detect-toengage
exercises; |
| b)
|
Incorporating anti-terrorism training into existing training events;
|
| c)
|
Adjusting training levels to ensure that deployment can be stepped up quickly and at multiple locations in response
to world events; and
|
| d)
|
Conducting new or modified training associated with the introduction of the new MH-60 helicopter variants, and new
organic mine countermeasure systems.
|
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Includes implementation of Alternative 1 with
additional increases in operations (with the exception of elimination of live bombing
at sea). Alternative 2 also includes designation of Mine Warfare Training Areas in
the Jacksonville and Charleston OPAREAs for enhanced mine countermeasures
and neutralization training during major exercises. The Navy proposes to conduct
mine hunting and sweeping operations in the same general area used for other
major exercise events. Since water depth there is too deep for routine retrieval of
submerged objects, these operations would take place without target mineshapes.
The Navy further proposes to conduct mine neutralization operations in the areas
currently designated for underwater detonation training. The water depth is suitable in these areas for the placement of
expendable inert mineshapes, which
are used to simulate a mine threat
environment.
Under Alternative 2, the Navy
proposes to eliminate all bombing
exercise training events that involve
dropping explosive (live) ordnance on
targets at-sea. The at-sea target in
these exercises is usually a flare or
smoke float.